Who is in control of local government in Clarkstown? It canโt be the members of the Town Board who show up to sit โpoker-facedโ mute at Board meetings and then vote like a Soviet Politburo.
The state of monarchy is the supremest thing upon earth; for kings are not only Godโs lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon Godโs throne, but even by God himself are called gods โ King James I of England, โWorksโ (1609)
By
Michael N. Hull
In the June 10, 2013 issue of the Journal News Hema Easley reported that Clarkstown will begin work on three community centers, spending more than $2.8 million to upgrade the facilities.
Ed Lettre, the townโs public works administrator and leader of the minority Conservative Party was quoted as saying that without the upgrades the community centers โpose a health and safety risk for users and could expose the town to liability. Some of the work was essential repairs to buildings that were getting old. Bottom line, these are all properties in the Town of Clarkstown โ they have to be maintained and repaired. We have to do everything to protect the integrity of our assets.โ
Writing in New City Patch Robin Traum pointed out that the contract and contingency costs total $2,811,940 but the board authorized issuing bonds for $2,815,000 to pay for the work. The project cost more than quadrupled from the initial estimate of $621,000 presented to the town town board in April 2012.
Lettre is the person who sat before the Town Workshop over one year ago and tried to sell the $621,000 estimate to a skeptical Board. I got the feeling back then that a sense of desperation had crept into his poorly presented proposal. Lettre gave the impression he was in a panic that Councilmen Hoehmann and Borelli were calling his bluff.
While Lettre opined, pleaded, cajoled, begged and, God knows, even prayed that the Board would give him the money, I remarked that Lettreโs performance reminded me of Lewis Black, who appears on Jon Stewartโs โThe Daily Showโ. Black commented:
โI took economics, and Iโd explain it to ya, but I flunked that course. Not my fault. They taught it at 8 oโclock in the morning. And there is absolutely nothing you can learn out of one bloodshot eye.โ
One bloodshot eye? The Town Board members must each have two bloodshot eyes after Lettreโs latest proposal which was approved last month without so much as even a single eyelid being batted or, Heaven forbid, a single question having been asked.
In 2012 Lettre, who controls the Conservative Party election line that will be given to Gromack, Hausner and Hoehmann for the coming election in 2013, was told to come back to an open public workshop with a better proposal. That is what many who sat in on the meeting as interested observers heard. But then 2012 was not an election year. Things are different now and there are election lines to be sought. Who knows what Lettre might do with his Conservative Party cross-endorsements if the Town Board was to question him anywhere else but behind closed doors.
And so the Town Board, with three of its members seeking Lettreโs imprimatur and perhaps his personal blessing as they run for office in less than five months, provided no opportunity for public input at a Town Board meeting as promised. Instead they hid Lettreโs โfiscalityโ by deliberating for a year beneath a veil of secrecy to emerge briefly cicada-like into the daylight and approve a $2.8 Million expenditure be added to the taxpayersโ present debt load which now stands at $100 million.
That is money that you the taxpayers will have to cough up with future raises in your taxes and depreciation of your home values.
This is quite a remarkable turn of events in this poker game because in response to Lettreโs original bet of $621,000 Councilman Hoehmann called his bluff expressing concern about this gamble given what would happen once all of the fees came in. Hoehmann placed a winning hand on the table saying:
โThis could be a $900,000 price tag for these community centers. I think we need to look at an overall plan that makes sense.โ
Now Hoehmann has apparently thrown his hand in when Lettre followed on the next deal by raising the ante to over twice Hoehmannโs โdoomsdayโ $900,000 figure.
At the same meeting Councilman Borelli asked for a firm cost. โIโm asking for the bottom line cost, the inclusive cost for all these repairs,โ he said. Now when presented with a bill of $2.8 million in an election year, and with no opportunity for public input, the โoverall planโ apparently โmakes senseโ to the Town Boardโs poker players and the amount Lettre came up with has been unanimously and abruptly approved and all hands cashed in.
Tom Nimick, a New City resident, who has pointed out on numerous occasions that the Town Board repeatedly violates the intent and practice of the Open Meetings Laws, commented at the Boardโs May 2013 meeting that in April 2012 Lettre was told by them to come back with more precise estimates and to incorporate other items that the Board Members wanted considered. Given that there was no subsequent open Town Board meeting and since the Board saw fit to approve this massive expenditure and to run up more debt to pay for it, he pointed out that it was obvious there must have been deliberations behind closed doors despite taxpayersโ interest in learning more about this project before any approvals were given to spend their funds.
Yet when Mr. Nimick publicly challenged the Board as to why it did not conduct the open meeting that was promised and why it held an inappropriate vote of approval without open deliberations, he was โignored by some Board membersโ while others spoke of โprivate consultationsโ with Mr. Lettre.
Private consultations? Mr. Nimick observed: โThis is terrible governance and extreme lack of transparencyโ. Mr. Borelli indicated that Mr. Lettre had addressed his concerns directly and privately. According to the Open Meetings Law, the deliberations of the Town Board are to be open and visible to the public. Private individual meetings or communications with members of the Town Board so as to avoid open deliberations flouts the intent of the Open Meetings Law. Further, Mr. Gromackโs recent statement made to a citizenโs inquiry that there were three open meetings is inaccurate and, since it was made specifically in response to a question about open meetings, dishonest.
Mr. Borelliโs public concern about Town expenditures in the past two years has only risen to the level of asking why Councilwoman Lasker should be paid $10,000 more than him for her work on the Town Board. He casually mentioned in the same breath that the Townโs bonded debt was approaching $100 million and that this was a โconcernโ to him at which point he tossed his cards on the table.
The question that this Town Boardโs behavior raises is: To whom is Mr. Lettre responsible? Is he accountable to the members of the Town Board as elected representatives of โwe the peopleโ?
It appears that he is not. On the contrary, the Town Board appears beholden to him especially in this election year when he has the power to supply the Conservative Partyโs election line to three of the Town Board members.
Is this the reason that they do not wish to question him in an open public meeting of the Town Board and hold him accountable to explain how this estimate for the expenditure of taxpayersโ funds quadrupled in 12 months?
It is no secret that Lettre, a Town Employee being paid just over $170,000 per year, is referred to openly as Clarkstownโs โKingmakerโ with others denying the truth of that moniker to claim that he is actually Clarkstownโs โKingโ. It is speculated that because he controls the Conservative party he controls the Town Board and its members do his bidding or lose his party line and with it their re-election hopes and the $40,000 of annual compensation that goes along with a Town Board seat.
Recall that when Lettre called a โHouse of Horrorsโ meeting, reportedly to keep himself in power as leader of the Conservative party, every member of the Town Board attended including the Town Attorney and the Superintendent of Highways, Wayne Ballard. Councilwoman Lasker couldnโt be there but because she โappreciated Mr. Lettreโs supportโ she โlistened in by phoneโ. Lettreโs efforts proved successful and he defeated a Jewish challenger for his partyโs leadership by holding the Conservative Party convention on Yom Kippur.
The fact that Lettre seems to be able to get the Board to approve a two million dollar expenditure without an open public Town Board meeting would suggest that his new moniker might be Clarkstownโs โKing of Diamondsโ in whose court genuflecting officials bow to the exercise of his divine right in order to retain their seat on His Majestyโs council.
Somehow I suspect that Mr. Nimick and other members of the public are unwilling to accept this Boardโs behavior in granting anyone โdivine rightsโ to control the purse strings of their rapidly vanishing diamonds.
Michael N. Hull is a retired senior citizen who writes opinion pieces on theology, philosophy and local political issues. He is presently a Director of Clarkstown Residents Opposing Patronage (CROP) with Tom Nimick and Ralph Sabatini and is President of the Residents Association of Bardonia.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login