Ed Snowden Update

BY MATTHEW SHI

JULY 16, 2013โ€”In a statement released last Friday, Edward Snowden, NSA โ€œwhistleblower,โ€ indicated intentions to apply for asylum in Russia, where he hopes to stay until he is able to fly to Latin America. Countries including Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, and Ecuador plan to grant Snowden the right to stay if he can make it to their ports of entry.

Lawyer Anatoly Kucherena explains Snowdenโ€™s reason for seeking asylum, saying, โ€œHe faces persecution by the U.S. government and he fears for his life and safety, fears that he could be subjected to torture and capital punishment.โ€

Snowden has been stuck in the transit zone of the Sheremetyevo airport in Moscow ever since he arrived from Hong Kong on June 23. Although several Latin American nations have offered him asylum, he is facing difficulties reaching those countries. His U.S. passport has been revoked.

Russian President Vladimir Putin referred to Snowdenโ€™s arrival as an โ€œunwelcome presentโ€ that the U.S. imposed on Russia. These sentiments are due to Snowdenโ€™s current inability to leave Moscow. He flew to Moscow intending only for a temporary stay, but, as Putin says, the U.S. has intimidated other countries into denying Snowdenโ€™s entry, which has prevented Snowdenโ€™s departure from Moscow.

Relations between Moscow and Washington are not without tension, and Snowdenโ€™s presence has only further strained these relations. In a diplomatic move, Putin made it clear that Snowden would only be granted asylum if he stopped leaking information harmful to the United States. Vyacheslav Nikonov, Russian parliament member, confirmed that Snowden will no longer leak such information: โ€œHe said he was informed of this condition and he can easily accept it. He does not intend to damage the United Statesโ€™ interests given that he is a patriot of his country.โ€

Presidential spokesperson Dmitry Peskov reminded the media that, though Snowden vocally agreed to Putinโ€™s condition, he has not agreed to anything in writing.

The claims of Snowdenโ€™s patriotism may strike some people as odd. After all, he did inform on a governmental agency, simultaneously betraying his contract. Others would defend Snowden, saying that he had the peopleโ€™s interests in mind, and that it was right to expose the NSA for illegal actions.

However, the legality of the NSAโ€™s surveillance is still in question. The actions appear to clearly violate the 4th and 5th Amendments to the Constitution and several other statutes and treaties, but the U.S. government has claimed that secret court rulingsโ€”kept private from the worldโ€”justified the affair. Snowden, on these clandestine rulings, said, โ€œThe immoral cannot be made moral through the use of secret law.โ€

When asked where Snowden could go in the future, Putin replied in a terse, disinterested manner: โ€œHow would I know? Itโ€™s his life, his fate.โ€

You must be logged in to post a comment Login